What is the impact of over-reading quality review on spirometry in clinical trials?

It has become best practice to review the quality of spirometry data, testing feedback, and overall quality of clinical trials spirometry data.

 A study by Mottram et al. identified that an average of 12.2% of test sessions had a change to the original decision by the testing site related to manoeuvre acceptability. This result was calculated from the prevalence of changes made to a spirometry test session by over-readers (OR) in three asthma clinical trials. The data was analysed to determine the number of test sessions where a manoeuvre was either accepted or rejected by the OR, and highlights the importance of quality control for spirometry data.

Read the full report from Mottram et al.

Vitalograph provides over-reading (data QA) services for all key endpoint data collected by our systems, including spirometry, DLco, respiratory muscle strength assessment, lung volumes and ECG.

Learn about our expertise in this area.

| Vitalograph Clinical Trials |

Related Articles

Aurika Savickaite is passionate about non-invasive ventilation (NIV) via helmet, and she has now set up a website www.helmetbasedventilation.com to share her expertise and knowledge with others. Having been involved in the successful testing of helmet ventilation at the University of Chicago, Aurika has invaluable insight to share.
We were at the very first Medica trade fair in Düsseldorf, showcasing our innovative spirometry technology. Both Medica and Vitalograph have come a long way since 1968.